22.4.06



Le vent

5 Comments:

Blogger Vincent said...

Thanks for that, Fitta. I'm not too familiar with blogs, so I don't know if I'm meant to answer here or on your blog, but anyway: I had a look on your pics, especially those from February. Photography is not really about the camera, but much more about the photographer, and I can assure you that you have a true photographer's eye :-)

10:48 PM  
Blogger Vincent said...

Yup, from what I've seen, your camera has a pretty low resolution. And you're right: having several lenses gives you a lot more freedom. Although, to be honest, modern digital compact cameras are not bad at all ("Christian", "Waterloo" and "Dame en mauve" have been taken with such a camera). Anyway, I can only encourage you to get more into photography, as this is a gratifying hobby/profession - certainly less boring than your current job ;-)

10:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonyme said...

Franchement, il y a du Van Gogh dans cette photo! Le ciel est fabuleux et menaçant, les épis ont l'air nonchalants mais ils risquent de passer un mauvais quart d'heure...
Tout est net ou plutôt tout est flou, ce qui donne l'impression d'entrer dans la photo, de sentir le vent voire les premières gouttes de pluie.
Toute une atmosphère: si c'était une affiche de film, j'achèterais mon billet tout de suite!
Benjamin

9:44 AM  
Blogger Vincent said...

Waouw, les mots me manquent... Merci Benjamin !

11:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonyme said...

Oui c'est certainement la meilleure photo (même s'il est assez difficile de choisir LA meilleure :)) car on a bien l'impression de "voir" le vent!

1:16 PM  

Enregistrer un commentaire

<< Home